All Things Writing

The Craft of Writing


Leave a comment

Redirecting Your WordPress Blog

I admit it. Sometimes, after I’ve started something, a better idea comes along. The choice is to wait until I’ve thought of the ideal name or thing – oh, wait. That’s what I thought I did – or get going with what I’ve got. The penalty of starting and changing your mind can be excessive…

The last time I needed to switch my blog to a new url it was a nightmare. I honestly don’t want to think about it, let alone describe it in detail. THIS time I decided I needed a different name for my fluid dynamics blog – I had Fluid Dynamics in Action as the name because it was about fluid dynamic principles in action. It seemed to anyone interested in fluid dynamics that I was simply not aware that fluid dynamics is the study of fluids in motion.

Anyway. I wanted to change the url for my blog from FluidDynamicsInAction to FluidsInMotion.

All I needed to do was redirect the traffic from the first url to the second. It costs $13 per year and took about three minutes to do. Imagine my delight to discover all my content and formatting is now at the new url!

Yes! So you can go to http://fluiddynamicsinaction.wordpress.com and you’ll wind up at http://fluidsinmotion.wordpress.com. If you go to http://fluidsinmotion.wordpress.com you’ll wind up there, too.

Oh. Happy, happy, happy day!

If you need to make a change between WordPress urls or even a complete change in domains, this will walk you through it.


Leave a comment

Press Release!

The press release is out today! It’s listed on EurekAlert! This is amazing.


Leave a comment

Crazy

My book came out in October and it’s been a scramble ever since. I’ve never promoted a book. Even though I’ve read what others have done to promote their books, I still wasn’t sure where to begin. I started doing anything that would attract my attention and – voila – I’m getting a mention here and there. My press release goes out tomorrow. My website is ready. My general science blog, Synthesis, is ready. My fluid dynamics blog, Fluid Dynamics in Action, is all set. I’ve tried to create a meaningful Facebook presence – sorry to everyone who has been pestered with unintended emails today!!!!!

Now all I can do is see what happens next!


Leave a comment

One Ring-y Ding-y

Does anyone else remember life before the phone company break up? What was to result was a new era of lower phone rates and ease of access.

Ha. Ha. Ha.

I am in one of Verizon’s layers of Hell at the moment. I don’t know my account number. The pin I think is my pin is not my pin. I know the last four digits of the account number from my ebill. I’m calling from the number of the account. I want to PAY THEM MONEY. But is that enough?

NO!

Before I can pay the bill that goes with the account for the phone I’m calling on, I have to have the pin or the account.

Speak to a person, you say? The people have left the building!

This is maddening because I know I’m going to lose my internet and phone any minute now and there’s nothing I can do about it!

WHere is Lily Tomlin when you need her?


Leave a comment

My Book is Out!

Yes. Modeling Ships and Space Craft: The Science and Art of Mastering the Oceans and Sky is out! Amazon.com even has a “look inside” feature on my book!

I’ve discovered that a site called Novel Rank allows me to track my ranking on Amazon.com. I’ve also learned that the ASIN number is the ISBN-10. I’m looking into ways to market my book to science profs, teachers, schools, professionals….

I’ll keep you posted!

(Here’s the blurb: Modeling Ships and Space Craft: The Science and Art of Mastering the Oceans and Sky begins with the theories of Aristotle and Archimedes, moving on to examine the work of Froude and Taylor, the early aviators and the Wright Brothers, Goddard and the other rocket men, and the computational fluid dynamic models of our time. It examines the ways each used fluid dynamic principles in the design of their vessels. In the process, this book covers the history of hydrodynamic (aero and fluid) theory and its progression – with some very accessible science examples – including seminal theories. Hydrodynamic principles in action are also explored with examples from nature and the works of man. This is a book for anyone interested in the history of technology – specifically the methods and science behind the use of scale models and hydrodynamic principles in the marine and aeronautical designs of today.)


Leave a comment

Blogging at BioBuzz!

I’m delighted to announce that I’m a member of the BioBuzz blog team. BioBuzz covers all things BioTech and is working to build a strong BioTech community in Maryland. They offer networking events, news, mentors, and info on career opportunities.

I’m currently covering biofuels – and couldn’t be happier about it.

Check out my first post!

Gina


1 Comment

Adoption and Health Records

Unfortunately, I’ve been spending a lot of time in the ER and various doctor offices with one of my kids. This particular child happens to have joined us through adoption. I have limited – and I do mean limited – information about the birth parents. There is no information on the health history of the genetic parents.

I’ve noticed that when we are asked questions at the doctor and ER, when we answer that we don’t know, it gets recorded as a No. Now there is a world of difference between, “I don’t know if there is a family history of a horrible disease” and “There is no family history of a horrible disease.” As the record is built for this particular child, it looks as if we know for sure that a number of unsavory options are decidedly remote possibilities.

I’ve also noticed that there is no box to check to indicate that my child joined us through adoption. Neither is there a box for children who are in foster care, those who were conceived via anonymous donors, etc. As a result, we are asked the same questions about health history and must explain it over and over and over again. That would be okay if it made a difference, but each new person starts with the health history and the same set of questions. Yes. We can state at the outset that we are an adoptive family but what if my child arrives without me and is unable to speak? What poor decisions are going to be made on the basis of these flawed medical records?

I think it’s time that medical forms and records embrace the a significant portion of the population does not know the answer to some very important medical questions. There should be a box for I don’t know on the forms that comprise the basis of our health records.

Anyone out there agree with me? Maybe we can get things rolling for a much-needed change.


Leave a comment

Strange Topics

Somewhere along the way to becoming a full-time freelance writer, I developed a taste for strange topics.

The first topic was extra-virgin olive oil. That topic piqued my interest when I learned that not all extra virgin olive oil was actually extra virgin. My attempts to follow up were met with stony silence. The result? Someone else wrote what I will always regretfully consider “my” book.

The next topic was master sauces. I know. Who gets excited about master sauces?[That’s me waving madly, by the way.] What about master sauces? I’m not sure. I’ve read several books about them and tried a few on my own BUT the great good news is that there is a three-part sauce techniques class coming up in October and I will be one of the students!

Where is this going to lead? No clue. I’m in what I believe journalists refer to as the “reporting” part of the story. I have enough experience now to understand that this is a time to enjoy as I learn about my topic and see what resonates with me.

I’ve been waiting for this opportunity for over a year!

Go me.


1 Comment

Rounding Third

So close to completion of my book on applied fluid dynamics. It’s due to my editor on Monday and the thing that takes me a bit by surprise is how much I love this book. Still. It’s the book I envisioned at the start. It’s a book that fills a niche — I know this for a fact because I looked everywhere for a book like this when I was trying to understand fluid dynamics in nature and in practice.

The Book, as we refer to it at home, has four sections. The first is about fluid dynamic principles in action. It covers aquatic animals, mans attempts to imitate the fish and the birds, and flight. The second section covers the theorists in hydrodynamics and aerodynamics. It fits it all together so you can see how the work of one laid the foundation for the others. The third section covers scale model testing from William Froude through the Wright Brothers. It also covers prototyping with Goddard. The last section covers computational fluid dynamics.

It’s not a highly technical book; it’s intended to be accessible to non-scientists. For pure elegance, nothing can touch Adair’s “The Physics of Baseball,” but this book sings to me. After all this time and effort, I’m delighted that’s still the case.


Leave a comment

Journalistic Integrity

I am appalled. Absolutely appalled. I’ve just listened to the retraction issued by  This American Life in relation to the Mike Daisey story about Apple in China. Entitled, “The Agony and the Ecstasy of Steve Jobs,” Daisey’s stage show recounts his visit to Apple’s Foxconn factory.

This retraction (Episode 460: Retraction) to the story run on This American Life (Episode 454: Mr. Daisey and the Apple Factory) includes conversations with the interpreter, Cathy Lee, that Daisey told This American Life reporter Ira Glass, he had no way to contact. Her reaction to the discrepancies is that Daisey “is a writer. So I know what he say is only maybe half of them or less actual But he is allowed to do that, right? Because he’s not a journalist.”

That would be fine if Daisey had portrayed what he wrote as a work of fiction but he did not. In fact, Daisey knew that his story was going to be used on This American Life, and he was told that whatever was aired on that show had to be factually accurate. This is what Daisey told Ira Glass in the interview about fact checking with This American Life producer Brian Reed that followed the Schmitz interview in the retraction:

  • Glass reads from email from Reed to Daisey: …Being that news stations are obviously a different kind of form than theater, we wanted to make sure that this thing is totally, utterly unassailable by anyone who might hear it.
  • Glass reads from Daisey’s return email: I totally get that. I want you to know that makes sense to me. A show built orally for the theater is different than what typically happens in a news station. I appreciate that you’re taking the time to go over this.
  • Glass: And so you understood that we wanted this to be accurate in the most traditional sense.
  • Daisey: Yes. I did.

Rob Schmitz, China correspondent for the public radio program Marketplace first noted the discrepancies in Daisey’s show. It was he who interviewed Daisey in the first part of the retraction show. Even simple things were suspect and Daisey admitted he had visited fewer factories than he’d said. He also said he didn’t actually have a girl say she was twelve; he used that age to cover the spread of the age of the girls that he suspected they were. And, he did not actually meet hexane-damaged workers — shaking uncontrollably or otherwise — as he said he had in his monologue.

  • Schmitz: Let’s talk about the hexane poisoned workers. Cathy says that you did not talk to workers who were poisoned by hexane and were shaking uncontrollably.
  • Daisey: That’s correct. I met workers in Hong Kong going to Apple protests who had not been poisoned by hexane but had known people who had been, and it was like a constant conversation we were having about these workers. So no, they were not at that meeting.
  • Schmitz: So you lied about that. That wasn’t what you saw?
  • Daisey: I wouldn’t express it that way.
  • Schmitz: How would you express it?
  • Daisey: I wanted to tell a story that captured the totality of my trip and so when I was building the scene of that meeting I wanted to have the voice of this thing that had been happening that had been talking about.
  • Glass: So you didn’t meet any worker who’d been poisoned by hexane?
  • Daisey: That’s correct.

Why does it matter? It matters because those of us who write narrative nonfiction take what we do very seriously. Everything must be true. It must happen the way it happened; not the way we wish it had happened. The dialogue, the details, the characters — they need to be true. Composite characters are out. Moving events in time or space is out. Guesstimating is out.

To portray something as true when it is not true is the ultimate betrayal of public trust.

As for Daisey? This excerpt is from his website as of today, regrettably, says it all:

What I do is not journalism. The tools of the theater are not the same as the tools of journalism. For this reason, I regret that I allowed THIS AMERICAN LIFE to air an excerpt from my monologue. THIS AMERICAN LIFE is essentially a journalistic ­- not a theatrical ­- enterprise, and as such it operates under a different set of rules and expectations. But this is my only regret. I am proud that my work seems to have sparked a growing storm of attention and concern over the often appalling conditions under which many of the high-tech products we love so much are assembled in China.

This American Life Episode 460: Retraction

This American Life Episode 454: Mr. Daisey and the Apple Factory